Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tooth Age Impact on Dental Erosion Susceptibility and Treatment Efficacy.
Algarni, Amnah A; Lippert, Frank; Ungar, Peter; Platt, Jeffrey A; González-Cabezas, Carlos; Eckert, George J; Hara, Anderson T.
Afiliação
  • Algarni AA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madina, Saudi Arabia.
  • Lippert F; Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Ungar P; Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
  • Platt JA; Department of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • González-Cabezas C; Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Eckert GJ; Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Hara AT; Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Caries Res ; 55(6): 585-593, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34610601
ABSTRACT
This laboratory study investigated the impact of tooth age on dental erosion susceptibility and preventive treatment efficacy. Extracted human premolars were selected and had their age estimated (∼10-100 years old) using established dental forensic methods. Enamel and root dentin slabs were prepared, embedded in acrylic blocks, flattened, and polished. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of three treatments (n = 93) Sn+F (800 ppm Sn as SnCl2 and 250 ppm F as NaF, pH 4.5), NaF (250 ppm F, pH 4.5), or deionized water (DIW). Each specimen was subjected for 10 days to a daily cycling protocol consisting of six 5-min erosive challenges (0.3% citric acid, pH 2.6), six 60-min remineralization periods (artificial saliva), and three 2-min treatments with the test solutions. Surface loss (SL) was measured after 3, 5, and 10 days, using optical profilometry. Effects of tooth age, antierosive treatment, and time on SL were evaluated using linear mixed effects regression analysis. SL increased with age for all substrate-treatment-time combinations (p < 0.0001). Sn+F and NaF solutions significantly reduced SL compared to DIW, regardless of substrate, time, or age (p < 0.0001), with best results shown for Sn+F. Efficacy of Sn+F increased with tooth age on enamel, but tooth age did not affect the efficacy of NaF on enamel. For dentin, increased efficacy was observed with age after 5 (for Sn+F) and 10 days (for Sn+F and NaF). In conclusion, increase of tooth age rendered enamel and root dentin more susceptible to dental erosion. NaF preventive efficacy improved with tooth age for dentin, in advanced erosion simulation. Sn+F reduced enamel SL due to erosion regardless of tooth age.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erosão Dentária Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erosão Dentária Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article