Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis of chest compression-only versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for adult with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Bielski, Karol; Smereka, Jacek; Chmielewski, Jaroslaw; Pruc, Michal; Chirico, Francesco; Gasecka, Aleksandra; Litvinova, Nataliia; Jaguszewski, Milosz J; Nowak-Starz, Grazyna; Rafique, Zubaid; Peacock, Frank W; Szarpak, Lukasz.
Afiliação
  • Bielski K; Institute of Outcomes Research, Polonia Academy, Czestochowa, Poland.
  • Smereka J; Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Chmielewski J; Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Pruc M; Department of Emergency Medical Service, Medical University of Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Chirico F; College of Rehabiliation, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Gasecka A; Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Litvinova N; Institute of Outcomes Research, Polonia Academy, Czestochowa, Poland.
  • Jaguszewski MJ; Postgraduate School of Occupational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Nowak-Starz G; Health Service Department, State Police, Ministry of Interior, Milan, Italy.
  • Rafique Z; Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Peacock FW; 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
  • Szarpak L; European Medical School, International European University, Kiev, Ukraine.
Cardiol J ; 30(4): 606-613, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34622436
BACKGROUND: According to the guidelines of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) conducted by bystanders, two methods of CPR are feasible: standard CPR (sCPR) with mouth-to-mouth ventilations and continuous chest compression-only CPR (CCC) without rescue breathing. The goal herein, was to evaluate the effect of sCPR (30:2) and CCC on resuscitation outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. METHODS: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Using standardized criteria, Pub- Med, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane Collaboration were searched for trials assessing the effect of sCPR vs. CCC on resuscitation outcomes after adult OHCA. Random-effects model meta-analysis was applied to calculate the mean deviation (MD), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Overall, 3 randomized controlled trials and 12 non-randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. Survival to hospital discharge with sCPR was 10.2% compared to 9.3% in the CCC group (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93-1.16; p = 0.46). Survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome measured with the cerebral performance category (CPC 1 or 2) was 6.5% for sCPR vs. 5.8% for CCC (OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.84-1.20; p = 0.98). Prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in sCPR and CCC groups was 15.9% and 14.8%, respectively (OR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.91-1.39; p = 0.26). Survival to hospital admission with ROSC occurred in 29.5% of the sCPR group compared to 28.4% in CCC group (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.89-1.63; p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that there were no significant differences in the resuscitation outcomes between the use of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and chest compression only.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article