Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing food and nutrition literacy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of existing tools.
Carroll, Nicholas; Perreault, Maude; Ma, David Wl; Haines, Jess.
Afiliação
  • Carroll N; Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  • Perreault M; Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ONN1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Ma DW; Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  • Haines J; Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ONN1G 2W1, Canada.
Public Health Nutr ; : 1-16, 2021 Nov 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728004
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Food literacy (FL) and nutrition literacy (NL) are concepts that can help individuals to navigate the current food environment. Building these skills and knowledge at a young age is important for skill retention, confidence in food practices and supporting lifelong healthy eating habits. The objectives of this systematic review were to (i) identify existing tools that measure FL and NL among children and/or adolescents and (ii) describe the psychometric properties.

DESIGN:

A 4-phase protocol was used to systematically retrieve articles. The search was performed in May 2021. Study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted, and a narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. Risk of bias was assessed using the COSMIN checklist.

SETTING:

Six databases were searched to identify current tools.

PARTICIPANTS:

Children (2-12 years) and adolescents (13-18 years) participated in this study.

RESULTS:

Twelve tools were identified. Three tools measured FL, 1 tool measured NL, 4 tools measured both FL and NL, and 4 tools measured subareas of NL-more specifically, critical NL, food label and menu board literacy. Most tools were self-reported, developed based on a theoretical framework and assessed some components of validity and/or reliability for a specific age and ethnic group. The majority of tools targeted older children and adolescents (9-18 years of age), and one tool targeted preschoolers (3-6 years of age).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most widely used definitions of FL and NL do not acknowledge life-stage specific criterion. Continued efforts are needed to develop a comprehensive definition and framework of FL and NL appropriate for children, which will help inform future assessment tools.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article