Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of stenting prior to oral chemolysis of upper urinary tract uric acid stones.
Tsaturyan, Arman; Bosshard, Piet; Bokova, Elizaveta; Bonny, Olivier; Stritt, Kevin; Roth, Beat.
Afiliação
  • Tsaturyan A; Department of Urology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bosshard P; Department of Urology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bokova E; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Bonny O; Department of General Medicine, First Moscow State Medical University After I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russia.
  • Stritt K; Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Roth B; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 54(1): 37-45, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850328
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the impact of ureteral stenting on the success rate of oral chemolysis in the management of suspected uric acid upper urinary tract (UUT) stones.

METHODS:

Retrospective matched-pair analysis of 172 patients treated with oral chemolysis from 01/2010 to 12/2019. Patients with low density (upon non-contrast enhanced computer tomography [NCCT]), radiolucent (on plain radiography) urinary stones, a low urine pH (< 6) and/or history of uric acid urolithiasis were included. Potassium citrate and/or sodium bicarbonate were used for alkalization (target urine pH 6.5-7.2). Patient 11 matching was performed for the presence of indwelling ureteral stent, stone diameter, stone density, and stone localization. Stone-free status was evaluated after 12 weeks using NCCT. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors affecting the outcome.

RESULTS:

Mean patient age was 61 years (73% males). Mean stone size was 12 mm. Overall success rates after 12-weeks of chemolysis for stones at any localization in the UUT and ureteral stones were 60.5 and 77.3%, respectively. Smaller stone size (OR = 0.94; CI 0.888-0.992; p = 0.026) and lower pre-treatment urine pH (OR = 0.131; CI 0.023-0.737; p = 0.021) significantly increased the success of oral chemolysis. Ureteral stenting did not have any impact on the efficacy of oral chemolysis.

CONCLUSION:

Oral chemolysis is an effective treatment modality for patients with UUT stones suspected of uric acid content irrespective of ureteral stenting. Smaller stone diameter and lower urine pH at diagnosis increase its efficacy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Cálculos Ureterais / Stents / Bicarbonato de Sódio / Citrato de Potássio Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Cálculos Ureterais / Stents / Bicarbonato de Sódio / Citrato de Potássio Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article