Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A new predictor for indicating clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients: Frontal QRS-T angle.
Ocak, Metin; Tascanov, Mustafa Begenc; Yurt, Nur Simsek; Yurt, Yusuf Can.
Afiliação
  • Ocak M; Gazi State Hospital, Emergency Clinic Samsun, Turkey. Electronic address: mdmocak@gmail.com.
  • Tascanov MB; Department of Cardiology, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Yurt NS; Samsun Training And Research Hospital, Family Medicine Clinic, Turkey.
  • Yurt YC; Gazi State Hospital, Emergency Clinic Samsun, Turkey.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 631-635, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34879478
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

COVID-19; It spread rapidly around the world and led to a global pandemic. Indicators of poor prognosis are important in the treatment and follow-up of COVID-19 patients and have always been a matter of interest to researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between frontal QRS-T angle values and clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

This prospective case-control study was conducted with 130 COVID-19 patients whose diagnosis was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 100 healthy controls. The CURB-65 score was used as the clinical severity score.

RESULTS:

A total of 130 patients and 100 healthy controls were included in the study. When the patient and control groups were compared a significant difference was found between QT (378.07 ± 33.75 vs. 368.63 ± 19.65, p < 0.001), QTc (410.79 ± 28.19 vs. 403.68 ± 11.70, p < 0.001), QRS time (95.04 ± 21.67 vs. 91.42 ± 11.08, p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle (36.57 ± 22.86 vs. 22.72 ± 14.08, p < 0.001). According to clinical severity scoring, QT (370.27 ± 25.20 vs. 387.75 ± 40.19, p = 0.003), QTc (402.18 ± 19.92 vs. 421.48 ± 33.08, p < 0.001), frontal QRS-T angle (32.25 ± 18.79 vs. 41.94 ± 26.27), p = 0.0.16) parameters were found to be significantly different. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.111-1.298; p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.045; 95% [CI], 1.015-1.075; p = 0.003) values were found to be an independent predictor for the severity of the disease. Frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.101; 95% [CI], 1.030-1.176; p = 0.004), and CRP ([OR], 1.029; 95% [CI], 1.007-1.051; p = 0.01) parameters were found to be independent predictors for the mortality of the disease. As a mortality indicator; for the frontal QRS-T angle of ≥44.5°, specificity and sensitivity were 93.8% and 84.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Frontal QRS-T angle can be used as a reproducible, convenient, inexpensive, new and powerful predictor in determining the clinical severity and prognosis of COVID-19 patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletrocardiografia / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletrocardiografia / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article