Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patterns of stress and support in social support networks of in-home hospice cancer family caregivers.
Guo, Jia-Wen; Reblin, Maija; Tay, Djin; Ellington, Lee; Beck, Anna C; Cloyes, Kristin G.
Afiliação
  • Guo JW; University of Utah, College of Nursing, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84112.
  • Reblin M; Moffitt Cancer Centre, Health Outcomes and Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, USA 33612.
  • Tay D; University of Utah, College of Nursing, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84112.
  • Ellington L; University of Utah, College of Nursing, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84112.
  • Beck AC; 1. University of Utah School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84132; 2. University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Supportive Oncology and Survivorship, 1950 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84112.
  • Cloyes KG; University of Utah, College of Nursing, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84112.
J Soc Pers Relat ; 38(11): 3121-3141, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34898795
ABSTRACT
Family caregivers of home hospice cancer patients often experience burden and distress, which can be mitigated by perceived social support. However, less attention has been paid to the non-family sources of support within social networks, or to how sources of support may also be sources of stress. We describe support and stress in social networks of hospice family caregivers and identify caregiving characteristics associated with classes identified in our data. We collected demographic and psychosocial self-report data from family caregivers providing in-home hospice care for advanced cancer patients (N = 90). Caregivers also reported perceived support and stress from specific family and non-family relationships. We identified three classes with unique patterns of stress and support within caregivers' support networks using a latent class analysis. Classes include 1) high support, low stress across family and non-family network members ("supportive"; 53% of caregivers); 2) high support, high stress across family and non-family network ("ambivalent maximizers"; 26%); and 3) high support, high stress across family network only ("family-focused ambivalent"; 21%). Caregivers in the ambivalent maximizer class reported more burden than caregivers in the supportive class (p = .024). This is one of the first studies to systematically explore the role of non-family support, as well as how stress and support co-occur within relationships and across networks. As informal support networks of hospice family caregivers are complex and multifaceted, understanding the patterns of support and stress across various network members is essential to offer services to more effectively manage caregiver burden.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article