Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Demographics, Treatment Patterns, and Morbidity in Patients with Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction: An Administrative Claims Data Analysis.
Lanz, Miguel J; Gilbert, Ileen A; Gandhi, Hitesh N; Goshi, Nadia; Tkacz, Joseph P; Lugogo, Njira L.
Afiliação
  • Lanz MJ; Allergy and Asthma, AAADRS Clinical Research Center, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
  • Gilbert IA; BioPharmaceuticals Medical - US, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Gandhi HN; BioPharmaceuticals Medical - US, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Goshi N; BioPharmaceuticals Global Medicines Development - US, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • Tkacz JP; IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Lugogo NL; Pulmonary Clinic, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Asthma Allergy ; 14: 1485-1495, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924763
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is generally treated with short-acting ß2-agonists (SABA) before exercising, to prevent symptoms. Real-world data on treatments and outcomes for patients with EIB alone (EIBalone), or with asthma (EIBasthma), in the USA are limited. This study compared demographics, treatment patterns, morbidity, and costs of treating EIB between these two groups of patients. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Administrative claims from US IBM® MarketScan® Research databases were analyzed retrospectively. Patients aged ≥4 years filling a SABA claim between 1/1/2011 and 12/31/2016 were evaluated. Patients were indexed on a random SABA claim and required to have 12 months' continuous eligibility pre- and post-index, ≥1 maintenance medication and/or SABA fill post-index, and were designated EIBalone or EIBasthma according to diagnostic codes (EIB only or EIB plus asthma, respectively). Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS:

In total, 13,480 patients had EIBalone and 14,862 had EIBasthma. Compared with EIBasthma, the EIBalone group was older (mean[SD] 20.4[13.6] vs 17.8[13.6] years), had more females (60.7% vs 54.7%), and filled fewer SABA claims (1.9[1.4] vs 2.5[2.2]) (all p<0.001). A smaller proportion of patients in the EIBalone than EIBasthma group had maintenance therapy claims (79.9% vs 90.6%, p<0.001). The EIBalone group also had a lower proportion of patients with oral or injectable corticosteroid claims (29.4% vs 32.0%) and asthma and/or EIB-related emergency department (1.0% vs 13.0%) or outpatient visits (65.1% vs 72.3%; all p<0.0001). Annual days' supply of oral corticosteroids was similar between groups (mean[SD] EIBalone 20.7[30.8] vs EIBasthma 19.8[28] days).

CONCLUSION:

Individuals with EIBalone or EIBasthma demonstrate considerable morbidity. New treatment paradigms may be needed to optimize outcomes for both patient groups.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article