Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MR spectroscopy frequency and phase correction using convolutional neural networks.
Ma, David J; Le, Hortense A-M; Ye, Yuming; Laine, Andrew F; Lieberman, Jeffery A; Rothman, Douglas L; Small, Scott A; Guo, Jia.
Afiliação
  • Ma DJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Le HA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ye Y; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Laine AF; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Lieberman JA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Rothman DL; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.
  • Small SA; Radiology and Biomedical Imaging of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Guo J; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Magn Reson Med ; 87(4): 1700-1710, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34931715
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To introduce a novel convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach for frequency-and-phase correction (FPC) of MR spectroscopy (MRS) spectra to achieve fast and accurate FPC of single-voxel MEGA-PRESS MRS data.

METHODS:

Two neural networks (one for frequency and one for phase) were trained and validated using published simulated and in vivo MEGA-PRESS MRS dataset with wide-range artificial frequency and phase offsets applied. The CNN-based approach was subsequently tested and compared to the current deep learning solution multilayer perceptrons (MLP). Furthermore, random noise was added to the original simulated dataset to further investigate the model performance at varied signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels (i.e., 10, 5, and 2.5). Additional frequency and phase offsets (i.e., small, moderate, large) were also applied to the in vivo dataset, and the CNN model was compared to the conventional approach SR and model-based SR implementation (mSR).

RESULTS:

The CNN model is more robust to noise compared to the MLP-based approach due to having smaller mean absolute errors in both frequency (0.01 ± 0.01 Hz at SNR = 10 and 0.01 ± 0.02 Hz at SNR = 2.5) and phase (0.12 ± 0.09° at SNR = 10 and -0.07 ± 0.44° at SNR = 2.5) offset prediction. Furthermore, better performance was demonstrated for FPC when compared to the MLP-based approach, and SR when applied to the in vivo dataset for both with and without additional offsets.

CONCLUSION:

A CNN-based approach provides a solution to the automated preprocessing of MRS data, and the experimental results demonstrate the quantitatively improved spectra quality compared to the state-of-the-art approach.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Redes Neurais de Computação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Redes Neurais de Computação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article