Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Passive versus active service delivery: Comparing the effects of two parenting interventions on early cognitive development in rural China.
Sylvia, Sean; Luo, Renfu; Zhong, Jingdong; Dill, Sarah-Eve; Medina, Alexis; Rozelle, Scott.
Afiliação
  • Sylvia S; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Carolina Population Center, 1101-D McGavran-Greenberg Bldg., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Luo R; China Center for Agricultural Policy, School of Advanced Agricultural Science, 409 Wangkezhen Bldg., Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Zhong J; School of Economics, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
  • Dill SE; Rural Education Action Program, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, 616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Medina A; Rural Education Action Program, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, 616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Rozelle S; Rural Education Action Program, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, 616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
World Dev ; 149: 105686, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980940
ABSTRACT
We present the results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effects of a free, center-based parenting intervention on early cognitive development and parenting practices in 100 rural villages in China. We then compare these effects to a previous trial of a home-based intervention conducted in the same region, using the same parenting curriculum and public service system, accounting for potential differences between the studies. We find that the center-based intervention did not have a significant impact on child development outcomes, but did lead to increases in the material investments, time investments, and parenting skills of caregivers. The average impact of the center-based intervention on child skills and investments in children was significantly smaller than the home-visiting intervention. Analysis of the possible mechanisms suggests that the difference in effects was driven primarily by different patterns of selection into program participation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article