Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence of Potential Discriminatory HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Prescribing Practices for People Who Inject Drugs Among a Small Percentage of Providers in the U.S.
Pleuhs, Benedikt; Mistler, Colleen B; Quinn, Katherine G; Dickson-Gomez, Julia; Walsh, Jennifer L; Petroll, Andrew E; John, Steven A.
Afiliação
  • Pleuhs B; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Mistler CB; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
  • Quinn KG; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Dickson-Gomez J; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Walsh JL; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Petroll AE; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • John SA; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 13: 21501319211063999, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35068243
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A large percentage of people who inject drugs (PWID) are living with HIV. Yet, rates of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among PWID remain low. Stigma surrounding substance use and PWID have been identified as potential barriers to PrEP. This study examined healthcare providers' concerns regarding PWID and willingness to prescribe PrEP to PWID.

METHODS:

An online, cross-sectional survey of a diverse group of healthcare providers in the 10 U.S. cities with the greatest HIV prevalence was conducted between July 2014 and May 2015. Participants responded to a patient vignette of a PWID and asked to indicate whether the patient would be a candidate for PrEP and why via free-response text. Descriptive statistics are reported using frequency measures. Bivariate analyses were conducted using chi-squared comparisons and logistical regression.

RESULTS:

Survey data from 480 providers were included in analyses. Of the 480 responses, 85.5% were classified as PrEP aware, while 14.2% were PrEP unaware. Additionally, 82.6% indicated the patient would be a good candidate for PrEP, 4.4% believed the patient was not a good candidate for PrEP, and 13% were unsure. Among those who were unsure or would not prescribe PrEP (n = 84), open-ended responses indicated lack of knowledge (42.9%), concern about adherence (27.4%), concern about cost (4.8%), and bias (7.1%) as the primary reasons.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the majority of providers in this study did not demonstrate bias against PWID, our study found that limited PrEP knowledge and bias are barriers to PrEP prescription among PWID for some providers. Interventions are needed that increase PrEP awareness of CDC guidelines and reduce implicit bias among providers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa / Fármacos Anti-HIV / Usuários de Drogas / Profilaxia Pré-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa / Fármacos Anti-HIV / Usuários de Drogas / Profilaxia Pré-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article