Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Non-Metastatic, Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
An, Josiah; Packiam, Vignesh T; Chennamadhavuni, Adithya; Richards, Jordan; Jain, Jayanshu; Mott, Sarah L; Garje, Rohan.
Afiliação
  • An J; Division of Hematology, Oncology, Blood & Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
  • Packiam VT; Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
  • Chennamadhavuni A; Division of Hematology, Oncology, Blood & Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
  • Richards J; Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
  • Jain J; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
  • Mott SL; Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
  • Garje R; Division of Hematology, Oncology, Blood & Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Front Oncol ; 11: 786307, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35083144
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) includes histologically and molecularly distinct subtypes such as papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct, and sarcomatoid RCC, with an incidence ranging from 20% to 25%. Oncologic outcomes and the role of adjuvant systemic therapy [vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (VEGFi) or immunotherapy] for non-ccRCC are not well-described.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the incidence and survival outcomes of non-ccRCC subtypes in comparison to ccRCC.

METHODS:

The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify patients with non-metastatic RCC (T1-T4, N0-N1) between 2004 and 2015. The non-ccRCC cohort was further stratified by histologic subtype papillary, chromophobe, sarcomatoid, and collecting duct RCC. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

The 5-year OS for chromophobe, papillary, clear cell, collecting duct, and sarcomatoid RCC was 91%, 82%, 81%, 44%, and 40%, respectively. After adjusting for clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics, there was no significant difference in OS between papillary RCC and ccRCC (p = 0.17). Patients with collecting duct and sarcomatoid subtypes were at over two times increased risk of death compared to patients with clear cell (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Conversely, patients with chromophobe RCC were at 36% decreased risk of death compared to ccRCC (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

This hospital-based analysis confirms that collecting duct and sarcomatoid histologic subtypes are uncommon and associated with poor survival after surgery when compared to the other RCC subtypes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapies in these subtypes to improve oncologic outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article