Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relative Validity and Reliability of Isometric Lower Extremity Strength Assessment in Older Adults by Using a Handheld Dynamometer.
Grootswagers, Pol; Vaes, Anouk M M; Hangelbroek, Roland; Tieland, Michael; van Loon, Luc J C; de Groot, Lisette C P G M.
Afiliação
  • Grootswagers P; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Vaes AMM; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Hangelbroek R; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Tieland M; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • van Loon LJC; Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • de Groot LCPGM; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Sports Health ; 14(6): 899-905, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120409
BACKGROUND: Handheld dynamometry (HHD) is a practical alternative to traditional testing of lower extremity strength. However, its reliability and validity across different populations and settings are not clear. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that HHD is a valid and reliable device to assess lower extremity strength in a population of older adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional/cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: This study included 258 older adults (≥65 years). Isometric knee extension and flexion force were measured by 1 examiner, using an HHD (n = 222), including 3 repetitions to calculate within-day intrarater reliability. These measurements were repeated by the examiner in a subgroup (n = 23) to analyze intrarater reliability over a test-retest period of on average 8 weeks. In addition, HHD force measures were performed by a second examiner (n = 29) to analyze interrater reliability. In another subgroup (n = 77), isometric knee extension and flexion torque were measured by 1 examiner using both the HHD and Biodex System 4 to assess relative validity. RESULTS: HHD and Biodex measurements were highly correlated and showed excellent concurrent validity. HHD systematically overestimated torque as compared with Biodex by 8 N·m on average. Same-day intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.97 to 0.98. Interrater reliability ICCs ranged from 0.83 to 0.95. CONCLUSION: HHD represents a reliable and valid alternative to Biodex to rank individuals on leg strength, or to assess within-person changes in leg strength over time, because of the high validity and reliability. The HHD is less suited for absolute strength assessment because of significant systematic overestimations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians are encouraged to use HHD to rank older adults on leg strength, or to assess within-person changes in leg strength over time, but not to compare readings with cut-offs or normative values.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Extremidade Inferior / Força Muscular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Extremidade Inferior / Força Muscular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article