Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discriminant Ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to Detect Swallowing Safety and Efficiency Impairments.
Donohue, Cara; Tabor Gray, Lauren; Anderson, Amber; DiBiase, Lauren; Chapin, Jennifer; Wymer, James P; Plowman, Emily K.
Afiliação
  • Donohue C; Aerodigestive Research Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Tabor Gray L; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Anderson A; Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • DiBiase L; Aerodigestive Research Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Chapin J; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Wymer JP; Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Plowman EK; Aerodigestive Research Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope ; 132(12): 2319-2326, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35137963
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/

HYPOTHESIS:

Quick, sensitive dysphagia screening tools are necessary to identify high-risk patients for further evaluation in busy multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinics. We examined the relationship between self-perceived dysphagia using the validated Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) and videofluoroscopic analysis of swallowing safety and efficiency. STUDY

DESIGN:

Prospective, observational, longitudinal study.

METHODS:

Individuals with ALS completed the EAT-10 and a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Duplicate, independent, blinded analyses of the validated Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale were performed to index swallowing safety and efficiency (mild dysphagia DIGEST ≥ 1, moderate dysphagia DIGEST ≥ 2). A between-groups analysis of variance with Games-Howell test for post-hoc pairwise comparisons was performed to examine EAT-10 scores across dysphagia severity levels. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive-negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and odds ratios (OR) were derived.

RESULTS:

Four hundred and thirty five paired EAT-10 and DIGEST scores were analyzed. Mean EAT-10 score was 8.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.63-9.33). Individuals with dysphagia demonstrated higher EAT-10 scores (mild 4.1 vs. 11.3, moderate 6.0 vs. 17.5, P < .001). Mean EAT-10 scores increased across DIGEST levels (D0 4.1, D1 7.9, D2 15.1, D3 20.4, D4 39.0). For mild dysphagia, an EAT-10 cut score of 3 was optimal AUC 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.78; sensitivity 77%; specificity 53%; PPV 71%; NPV 60%; OR 3.5). An EAT-10 cut score of 7 optimized detection of moderate dysphagia AUC 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.87; sensitivity 81%; specificity 66%; PPV 39%; NPV 93%; OR 8.1).

CONCLUSION:

The EAT-10 is an easy-to-administer dysphagia screening tool with good discriminant ability for use in ALS clinics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 1322319-2326, 2022.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Deglutição / Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Deglutição / Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article