Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5-year experience with GeneMatcher.
Towne, Meghan C; Rossi, Mari; Wayburn, Bess; Huang, Jennifer M; Radtke, Kelly; Alcaraz, Wendy; Farwell Hagman, Kelly D; Shinde, Deepali N.
Afiliação
  • Towne MC; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Rossi M; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Wayburn B; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Huang JM; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Radtke K; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Alcaraz W; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Farwell Hagman KD; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
  • Shinde DN; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.
Hum Mutat ; 43(6): 772-781, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35143109
ABSTRACT
Although the rates of disease gene discovery have steadily increased with the expanding use of genome and exome sequencing by clinical and research laboratories, only ~16% of genes in the genome have confirmed disease associations. Here we describe our clinical laboratory's experience utilizing GeneMatcher, an online portal designed to promote disease gene discovery and data sharing. Since 2016, we submitted 246 candidates from 243 unique genes to GeneMatcher, of which 111 (45%) are now clinically characterized. Submissions meeting our candidate gene-reporting criteria based on a scoring system using patient and molecular-weighted evidence were significantly more likely to be characterized as of October 2021 versus genes that did not meet our clinical-reporting criteria (p = 0.025). We reported relevant findings related to these newly characterized gene-disease associations in 477 probands. In 218 (46%) instances, we issued reclassifications after an initial negative or candidate gene (uncertain) report. We coauthored 104 publications delineating gene-disease relationships, including descriptions of new associations (60%), additional supportive evidence (13%), subsequent descriptive cohorts (23%), and phenotypic expansions (4%). Clinical laboratories are pivotal for disease gene discovery efforts and can screen phenotypes based on genotype matches, contact clinicians of relevant cases, and issue proactive reclassification reports.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article