One-stage versus staged laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for high-and intermediate anorectal malformations: Medium-term outcomes from a propensity score matching analysis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The timing of anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations (ARMs) is controversial and essential for long-term bowel function. The advantages of laparoscopy make primary anoplasty possible for neonates. This study aims to report the medium-term results of the one-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and compare them with the staged LAARP. METHODS: This study included 242 boys who underwent LAARP between June 2013 and December 2018 in our center. Forty-five neonatal patients successfully underwent the one-stage LAARP, and the remaining 197 patients who had already undergone colostomy received staged procedures. The complications and bowel function were compared between the two groups after 11 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Before matching, age at assessment and classification were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). After PSM, 42 patients were included in each of the two groups, and the patients were well balanced. The overall occurrence of postoperative complications in the one-stage group was significantly lower than in the staged group (P < 0.05). The median follow-up periods were 55.0 and 54.5 months, respectively. The mean value of BFS was similar in the two groups. After medical management, a second evaluation was conducted to distinguish overflow pseudo-incontinence from patients with no bowel control potential. The functional outcome in the two groups is comparable (P = 0.307). CONCLUSIONS: One-stage LAARP is safe and feasible for neonates with high-and intermediate-type ARMs. Compared with staged LAARP, one-stage LAARP has fewer complications and comparable functional outcomes. The authors recommend these procedures to be performed in dedicated centers with sufficient expertise. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.