Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Smoking cessation services and shared decision-making practices among lung cancer screening facilities: A cross-sectional study.
Lowenstein, Lisa M; Nishi, Shawn P E; Lopez-Olivo, Maria A; Crocker, Laura Covarrubias; Choi, Noah; Kim, Bumyang; Shih, Ya-Chen Tina; Volk, Robert J.
Afiliação
  • Lowenstein LM; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Nishi SPE; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
  • Lopez-Olivo MA; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Crocker LC; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Choi N; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Kim B; University of California San Diego Medical School, La Jolla, California.
  • Shih YT; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Volk RJ; Milken Institute, Santa Monica, California.
Cancer ; 128(10): 1967-1975, 2022 05 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35157302
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about how screening facilities are meeting the requirements for the reimbursement of lung cancer screening from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), including 1) the collection and submission of data to the CMS-approved registry (American College of Radiology [ACR] Lung Cancer Screening Registry), 2) the verification of a counseling and shared decision-making (SDM) visit having occurred as part of the written order for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography, and 3) the offering of smoking cessation interventions.

METHODS:

The authors identified facilities in a southwestern state that were listed by either the ACR Lung Cancer Screening Registry or the GO2 Foundation Centers of Excellence. To select facilities, they used 2 purposive sampling approaches maximum variation sampling and snowball sampling. They surveyed facilities from February to November 2019.

RESULTS:

There were 87 facilities contacted, and a total of 63 facilities representing 32 counties across Texas completed the survey. Nearly all facilities used Lung-RADS to classify nodules (92%; n = 58) and submitted data to a CMS-approved registry (92%; n = 57). Most facilities verified that the counseling and SDM visit had occurred (86%; n = 54). Although slightly more than half of the facilities reported always providing self-help cessation materials (68%; n = 42), similar or higher proportions of facilities reported that they never referred smokers to onsite cessation services (68%; n = 42) or quitlines (77%; n = 47), provided cessation counseling (81%; n = 50), or recommended medications (85%; n = 52).

CONCLUSIONS:

In general, screening facilities are meeting CMS requirements for screening, but they are struggling to offer smoking cessation interventions other than providing self-help materials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article