Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increased JUUL Emissions from Initial Puffs after Removing and Reinserting Pod.
Soule, Eric K; Sousan, Sinan; Streuber, Dillon; Fresquez, Sarah E; Mooring, Ronald; Salman, Rola; Talih, Soha; Pender, Jack.
Afiliação
  • Soule EK; Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States.
  • Sousan S; Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23220, United States.
  • Streuber D; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States.
  • Fresquez SE; North Carolina Agromedicine Institute, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States.
  • Mooring R; Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States.
  • Salman R; Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States.
  • Talih S; Department of Chemistry, Thomas Harriot College of Arts & Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States.
  • Pender J; Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23220, United States.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 35(3): 383-386, 2022 03 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35258926
ABSTRACT
Standard laboratory electronic cigarette (ECIG) puffing protocols that do not consider user behaviors, such as removing and resinserting a pod, may underestimate emissions. This study compared JUUL emissions from four 10-puff bout procedures. We generated ECIG aerosol in a chamber using a JUUL device and measured concentrations of particulate matter ≤2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5). The JUUL pod was removed and reinserted 0 times, 1 time, 4 times, and 9 times in experiments 1-4, respectively. Mean real-time PM2.5 concentration was 65.06 µg/m3 (SD = 99.53) for experiment 1, 375.50 µg/m3 (SD = 346.45) for experiment 2, 501.94 µg/m3 (SD = 450.00) for experiment 3, and 834.69 µg/m3 (SD = 578.34) for experiment 4. In this study, removing and reinserting a JUUL pod resulted in greater PM2.5 concentrations compared to puffing protocols in which the JUUL pod was not removed and reinserted. ECIGs should be examined and evaluated based on ECIG users' real-world behaviors.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina / Vaping Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina / Vaping Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article