Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The comparison between 2DE-MS and bottom-up LC-MS demands high-end techniques for both technologies.
Zhan, Xianquan; Jungblut, Peter R.
Afiliação
  • Zhan X; Shandong Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, P. R. China.
  • Jungblut PR; Medical Science and Technology Innovation Center, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, P. R. China.
Electrophoresis ; 43(11): 1242-1245, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285536
In contrast to bottom-up LC-MS only 2DE-MS can separate and detect a huge number of human protein species. Kwiatkowski et al. (in this issue) established parameters to estimate the amount of protein speciation for each human protein. Proteins identified in 2DE-MS approaches showed more protein speciation than in bottom-up LC-MS. The authors state that protein speciation is likely to increase the chance of proteins to be determined in 2-DE/MS, though admitting that low-sensitivity 2DE-MS methods were used in this study. In agreement with Kwiatkowski et al., we are convinced that the difference between 2DE-MS and bottom-up LC-MS will disappear, if high-resolution 2DE is combined with identification by a high-sensitivity LC-Orbitrap-MS. Meta-analysis of proteomic data is surely a promising tool, though the technological progress in 2DE and MS has to reach a plateau to enable useful comparisons.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteoma / Proteômica Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteoma / Proteômica Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article