Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of G-CSF Prophylaxis on Chemotherapy Dose-Intensity, Link Between Dose-Intensity and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Canton, Clémence; Boussari, Olayidé; Boulin, Mathieu; Le Malicot, Karine; Taieb, Julien; Dahan, Laetitia; Lopez, Anthony; Lepage, Come; Bachet, Jean-Baptiste.
Afiliação
  • Canton C; Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
  • Boussari O; EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
  • Boulin M; EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
  • Le Malicot K; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France.
  • Taieb J; EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
  • Dahan L; Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
  • Lopez A; EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
  • Lepage C; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France.
  • Bachet JB; Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Carpem, Sorbonne Paris City, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Oncologist ; 27(7): e571-e579, 2022 07 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35289915
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.

RESULTS:

Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in "prophylaxis" group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22).

CONCLUSION:

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article