Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches.
Hua, Fangyuan; Bruijnzeel, L Adrian; Meli, Paula; Martin, Philip A; Zhang, Jun; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Miao, Xinran; Wang, Weiyi; McEvoy, Christopher; Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis; Brancalion, Pedro H S; Smith, Pete; Edwards, David P; Balmford, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Hua F; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China.
  • Bruijnzeel LA; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
  • Meli P; Department of Geography, King's College London, Bush House, London WC2B 4BG, UK.
  • Martin PA; Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, P.R. China.
  • Zhang J; Department of Forest Sciences, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13.418-900, Brazil.
  • Nakagawa S; Departmento de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco, Chile.
  • Miao X; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
  • Wang W; Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Edificio sede no 1, planta 1, Parque científico UPV/EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
  • McEvoy C; Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, P.R. China.
  • Peña-Arancibia JL; Environmental Modelling, Sensing & Analysis, TNO, 1755 LE Petten, Netherlands.
  • Brancalion PHS; Evolution & Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Smith P; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China.
  • Edwards DP; Institute of Ecology and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China.
  • Balmford A; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Science ; 376(6595): 839-844, 2022 05 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35298279
Forest restoration is being scaled up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits; however, there is a lack of rigorous comparison of cobenefit delivery across different restoration approaches. Through global synthesis, we used 25,950 matched data pairs from 264 studies in 53 countries to assess how delivery of climate, soil, water, and wood production services, in addition to biodiversity, compares across a range of tree plantations and native forests. Benefits of aboveground carbon storage, water provisioning, and especially soil erosion control and biodiversity are better delivered by native forests, with compositionally simpler, younger plantations in drier regions performing particularly poorly. However, plantations exhibit an advantage in wood production. These results underscore important trade-offs among environmental and production goals that policy-makers must navigate in meeting forest restoration commitments.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Florestas / Recuperação e Remediação Ambiental Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Florestas / Recuperação e Remediação Ambiental Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article