Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parent-provided photographs as an outcome measure for childhood chalazia.
Erzurum, S Ayse; Wu, Rui; Melia, B Michele; Li, Zhuokai; Arnold, Robert W; Silbert, David I; Erickson, John W; Sala, Nicholas A; Kraker, Raymond T; Holmes, Jonathan M; Cotter, Susan A.
Afiliação
  • Erzurum SA; Eye Care Associates Inc, Poland, Ohio. Electronic address: erzurum2020@gmail.com.
  • Wu R; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
  • Melia BM; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
  • Li Z; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
  • Arnold RW; Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska.
  • Silbert DI; Conestoga Eye, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
  • Erickson JW; Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Sala NA; Pediatric Ophthalmology of Erie, Erie, Pennsylvania.
  • Kraker RT; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
  • Holmes JM; University of Arizona-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Cotter SA; Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, California.
J AAPOS ; 26(2): 60.e1-60.e5, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307542
PURPOSE: To determine whether smartphone photographs of children's eyelids are reliable for diagnosing the presence of chalazia. METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 60 participants, 7 months to 16.5 years of age, at four sites were enrolled; all participants had a chalazion measuring at least 2 mm on at least one eyelid based on an in-person clinical examination by a pediatric eye care professional. Smartphone photographs taken by the parent during the office visit were uploaded to the study website. A masked reader assessed each photograph for the presence or absence of chalazia; results were compared with the gold standard clinical examination results. Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of chalazion by eyelid were calculated. RESULTS: Photographs were available for 240 eyelids; 85 had at least one chalazion and 155 were without a chalazion based on clinical examination. The masked reader correctly classified 68 of 85 eyelids with at least one chalazion and 151 of 155 eyelids without chalazia for a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 72%-86%) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%). Sensitivity improved to 89% for chalazia 5 mm or larger and 94% when superficially located within the eyelid. CONCLUSIONS: Parental smartphone photographs appear to be useful in assessing chalazia in children as an alternative to in-office follow-up examinations. These photographs may be a valuable outcome measure in future clinical trials of chalazia treatment, especially when assessing larger lesions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Calázio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Calázio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article