Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ, 2008-2020: An observational study.
Kelly, Caitriona; Fitzpatrick, Patricia; Quinn, Cecily; Flanagan, Fidelma; Connors, Alissa; Larke, Aideen; Mooney, Therese; Kennedy, Maria; Sheehan, Margaret; Bennett, Michael W; Brodie, Caroline; O'Doherty, Ann.
Afiliação
  • Kelly C; School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, 8797University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Fitzpatrick P; Department of Public Health HSE North East, Navan, Ireland.
  • Quinn C; School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, 8797University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Flanagan F; 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Connors A; BreastCheck, 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Larke A; BreastCheck, 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Mooney T; BreastCheck, 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kennedy M; BreastCheck, 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Sheehan M; 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Bennett MW; BreastCheck, 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Brodie C; BreastCheck, 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Doherty A; 155307National Screening Service, Dublin, Ireland.
J Med Screen ; 29(3): 172-177, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341364
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the grade distribution of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed in Ireland, in the context of the clinical trials currently underway to determine if active surveillance is a feasible management option for low-risk DCIS.

SETTING:

BreastCheck is the national breast screening programme in Ireland, offering screening to women aged 50 to 69 every two years.

METHODS:

This study was a secondary analysis of data collected by BreastCheck on all screen-detected DCIS diagnosed in the 12 years of nationwide screening. Incidence and detection rates were calculated. Descriptive analysis of the cases was performed and, for comparative analysis, grade of DCIS was analysed as a binary variable (high vs. low/intermediate) in keeping with the inclusion criteria for active surveillance trials. Analysis was performed in IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.

RESULTS:

Between 2008 and 2020, 2240 women were diagnosed with DCIS through BreastCheck; 876 (39.1%) were low/intermediate-grade. The overall incidence rate has remained relatively stable during this period. Women with low/intermediate-grade DCIS were younger than women with high-grade DCIS (56 (interquartile range 56-61) years v 57 (interquartile range 53-61) years; p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have been diagnosed at an initial screening episode compared with those who had high-grade lesions (42.5% v 29.0%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

If current clinical trials recommend active surveillance as a feasible option for DCIS, up to 40% of women with screen-detected DCIS may be eligible. These women are younger and often diagnosed on initial screening episode, so may require longer active follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article