Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective cohort study by InspECT on safety and efficacy of electrochemotherapy for cutaneous tumors and metastases depending on ulceration.
Claussen, Carla Sophie; Moir, Graeme; Bechara, Falk G; Orlando, Antonio; Matteucci, Paolo; Mowatt, David; Clover, Anthony James P; Mascherini, Matteo; Gehl, Julie; Muir, Tobian; Sersa, Gregor; Groselj, Ales; Odili, Joy; Giorgione, Roberto; Campana, Luca Giovanni; Bertino, Giulia; Curatolo, Pietro; Banerjee, Shramana; Kis, Erika; Quaglino, Pietro; Pritchard-Jones, Rowan; De Terlizzi, Francesca; Grischke, Eva-Maria; Kunte, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Claussen CS; Department of Dermatosurgery and Dermatology, Artemed Clinic of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Moir G; The Royal London Hospital & QMUL, Barts Health NHS Trust, Department of Cutaneous Medicine & Surgery, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bechara FG; Department of Dermatologic Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
  • Orlando A; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Matteucci P; Department of Plastic surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Mowatt D; Plastic Surgery Department, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Clover AJP; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
  • Mascherini M; Cancer Research@UCC, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Gehl J; Clinica Chirurgica 1 - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Muir T; Center for Experimental Drug and Gene Electrotransfer (C*EDGE), Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Sersa G; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Groselj A; Plastic Surgery Department, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
  • Odili J; Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Giorgione R; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Campana LG; Department of Plastic Surgery, St. Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bertino G; Dermatologic Clinic of the University of Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
  • Curatolo P; Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
  • Banerjee S; Department of Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
  • Kis E; Department of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
  • Quaglino P; Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy.
  • Pritchard-Jones R; Division of Surgery and interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • De Terlizzi F; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Grischke EM; Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
  • Kunte C; Merseyside Regional Burns and Plastic Surgery Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 20(4): 470-481, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35384261
BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is an effective local treatment for cutaneous tumors. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ECT in ulcerated vs. non-ulcerated tumors and investigate the effect on tumor-associated symptoms. METHODS: Twenty cancer centers in the International Network for Sharing Practices on Electrochemotherapy (InspECT) prospectively collected data. ECT was performed following ESOPE protocol. Response was evaluated by lesion size development. Pain, symptoms, performance status (ECOG-Index) and health status (EQ-5D questionnaire) were evaluated. RESULTS: 716 patients with ulcerated (n = 302) and non-ulcerated (n = 414) cutaneous tumors and metastases were included (minimum follow-up of 45 days). Non-ulcerated lesions responded to ECT better than ulcerated lesions (complete response 65 % vs. 51 %, p = 0.0061). Only 38 % (115/302) with ulcerated lesions before ECT presented with ulcerated lesions at final follow-up. Patients with ulcerated lesions reported higher pain and more severe symptoms compared to non-ulcerated lesions, which significantly and continuously improved following ECT. In non-ulcerated lesions however, pain spiked during the treatment. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: ECT is a safe and effective local treatment for cutaneous tumors. While ECT improves symptoms especially in patients with ulcerated lesions, data suggest the implementation of a perioperative pain management in non-ulcerated lesions during ECT.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Eletroquimioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Eletroquimioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article