Comparative Efficacy of Water and Conventional Delivery during Labour: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Healthc Eng
; 2022: 7429207, 2022.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35392147
In many maternal settings, water delivery is widely available for women who do not have an increased risk of complications during childbirth. Soaking in water during labor has been associated with a number of maternal benefits. However, the situation of water birth is not well known, there is lack of hard evidence on safety, and little is known about the characteristics of women who give birth in water. In this paper, we have explored the effects of water delivery compared to the conventional delivery on the health of mothers and babies. For this purpose, clinical trials were conducted including women in labor, in which participants were treated with water labor or conventional labor, respectively, in the experimental and control group. In this analysis, we have selected 17 eligible studies which included 175654 participants. Compared to the conventional birth group, the risk of Apgar score <7 at 5 min of age in the water birth group dropped by 28% (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.52-1.00, I 2 = 25%, P=0.05). Also, the duration of labor was shorter the in water birth group whatever the labor stage was. The patients who underwent water birth showed an obviously lower rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.86, I 2 = 53%, P=0.007). In this meta-analysis, it was seen that water delivery has clinical significance in alleviating the pain of mothers, promoting the safety of mothers and infants, and reducing postpartum complications.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Água
/
Cesárea
Tipo de estudo:
Systematic_reviews
Limite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Infant
/
Newborn
/
Pregnancy
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article