Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MUC1 (CA27.29) before and after Chemotherapy and Prognosis in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Patients.
Huebner, Hanna; Häberle, Lothar; Müller, Volkmar; Schrader, Iris; Lorenz, Ralf; Forstbauer, Helmut; Fink, Visnja; Schochter, Fabienne; Bekes, Inga; Mahner, Sven; Jückstock, Julia; Nabieva, Naiba; Schneeweiss, Andreas; Tesch, Hans; Brucker, Sara Y; Blohmer, Jens-Uwe; Fehm, Tanja N; Heinrich, Georg; Rezai, Mahdi; Beckmann, Matthias W; Fasching, Peter A; Janni, Wolfgang; Rack, Brigitte.
Afiliação
  • Huebner H; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Häberle L; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Müller V; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Schrader I; Department of Gynecology, University of Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Lorenz R; Breast Center, Diakovere Henriettenstift, 30171 Hannover, Germany.
  • Forstbauer H; Gynecologic Practice Dres Lorenz, Hecker, Wesche, 38100 Braunschweig, Germany.
  • Fink V; Hemato-Oncological Practice Dres Forstbauer and Ziske, 53840 Troisdorf, Germany.
  • Schochter F; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Bekes I; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Mahner S; Clinic for Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Jückstock J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), 80337 Munich, Germany.
  • Nabieva N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), 80337 Munich, Germany.
  • Schneeweiss A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Tesch H; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Brucker SY; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Blohmer JU; Department of Oncology, Onkologie Bethanien, 60389 Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Fehm TN; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
  • Heinrich G; Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  • Rezai M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Beckmann MW; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Schwerpunktpraxis für Gynäkologische Onkologie, 40235 Fürstenwalde, Germany.
  • Fasching PA; Department of Breast Diseases, Breast Center of Duisburg, Sant Ana Hospitat, 47259 Duisburg, Germany.
  • Janni W; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Rack B; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(7)2022 Mar 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35406491
ABSTRACT
Soluble MUC1 has been discussed as a biomarker for predicting prognosis, treatment efficacy, and monitoring disease activity in breast cancer (BC) patients. Most studies in adjuvant settings have used preoperative assessment. This study, part of the SUCCESS-A trial (NCT02181101), assessed the prognostic value of soluble MUC1 before and after standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with high-risk BC were treated within the SUCCESS-A trial with either three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by three cycles of docetaxel or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel and gemcitabine. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic value of CA27.29 before and after chemotherapy relative to disease-free survival (DFS), along with established BC prognostic factors such as age, body mass index, tumor size, nodal status, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 status, and grading. Pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy CA27.29 assessments were available for 2687 patients of 3754 randomized patients. Pre-chemotherapy CA27.29 assessment was associated with DFS in addition to established prognostic factors. It had no prognostic value in node-negative patients, but there was a clear association in node-positive patients. Post-chemotherapy CA27.29 assessment did not add any prognostic value, either on its own or in addition to pre-chemotherapy CA27.29 assessment.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article