Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recovery of left ventricular function is associated with improved outcomes in LVAD recipients.
Olsen, Cameron; Mandawat, Aditya; Sun, Jie-Lena; Triana, Taylor; Chiswell, Karen; Karra, Ravi.
Afiliação
  • Olsen C; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Mandawat A; Chattanooga Heart Institute, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
  • Sun JL; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Triana T; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Chiswell K; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Karra R; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Center for Aging, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Regeneration Next, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: ravi.k
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 41(8): 1055-1062, 2022 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35410822
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The significance of recovered left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in LVAD recipients, outside of pump explantation, is unclear.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing first LVAD implantation at Duke University Hospital between 2006 and 2017 were evaluated for LVEF recovery up to 2 years following implant. Occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), hospitalization for heart failure (HF), pump thrombosis and death were assessed before and after LVEF recovery.

RESULTS:

Of 286 patients who met inclusion criteria, 9.8% reached a "threshold" of recovery with an LVEF ≥ 40%. 17.4% achieved "relative" recovery with an increase in LVEF ≥ 10% since LVAD implantation. For either definition, recovered patients had a lower incidence of a composite endpoint of GIB, HF hospitalization, pump thrombosis, or death compared to patients without recovery. Patients with "threshold" recovery had 4.7 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.7-33.6) compared to 48.8 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 39.5-60.3) without "threshold" recovery [p = .020]. Those with "relative" recovery had 14.1 events per 100 patient-years [95% CI, 5.9-33.8] versus 50.7 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 40.7-63.0) without "relative" recovery [p = 0.005]. However, improved outcomes in the "relative" recovery group were limited to those who also met the "threshold" definition. Importantly, among patients who achieved "threshold" recovery, the incidence of the composite endpoint declines in the postrecovery period, suggesting that LVEF recovery mechanistically results in improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

An LVEF ≥ 40% associates with better outcomes in LVAD recipients. Methods to promote recovery could reduce morbidity and mortality related to LVAD support.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Função Ventricular Esquerda Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Função Ventricular Esquerda Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article