Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined Use of S-ICD and Absorbable Antibacterial Envelopes: A Proof-of-concept Study.
Gasperetti, Alessio; Schiavone, Marco; Ziacchi, Matteo; Zanchi, Simone; Lombardi, Leonida; Viecca, Maurizio; La Greca, Carmelo; Gulletta, Simone; Lavalle, Carlo; Biffi, Mauro; Forleo, Giovanni B.
Afiliação
  • Gasperetti A; Cardiology Unit, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Viale G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
  • Schiavone M; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, Italy.
  • Ziacchi M; Cardiology Unit, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Viale G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy. marco.schiavone11@gmail.com.
  • Zanchi S; Cardiology Department, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
  • Lombardi L; Cardiovascular Department, Poliambulanza Institute Hospital Foundation, Brescia, Italy.
  • Viecca M; Cardiology Unit, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Viale G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
  • La Greca C; Cardiology Unit, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Viale G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
  • Gulletta S; Cardiovascular Department, Poliambulanza Institute Hospital Foundation, Brescia, Italy.
  • Lavalle C; Arrhythmia Unit and Electrophysiology Laboratories, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
  • Biffi M; Cardiology Department, Policlinico Umberto I - La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  • Forleo GB; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, Italy.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35438392
BACKGROUND: Absorbable antibacterial envelopes (AAEs) are currently recommended in patients undergoing a transvenous ICD implantation in cases at high risk of infection, who are now preferably implanted with a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD). Nevertheless, experiences using a combined approach with S-ICD and AAE have not been reported. The aim of our study was to evaluate this strategy in patients at very high risk of infection. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were implanted with the S-ICD+AAE using our combined approach, restricted to patients who would fit our decisional flow algorithm identifying very high-risk patients. Patients were followed up 1 month after discharge and every 6 months thereafter. Complications were defined as device-related events requiring medical or surgical intervention for resolution and/or device reprogramming. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (92% males, mean age 58.5±14.1 years) were implanted with the S-ICD device and the AAE using our combined approach. The most common high-infective risk factors were diabetes requiring insulin treatment (80%) and CKD requiring hemodialysis (48%), with 7 (28%) patients presenting with more than 2 risk factors. A single mild early post-operative hematoma was observed that was managed conservatively with a spontaneous resolution. Despite a very high-risk cohort, only a single late pocket infection was detected and solved conservatively with antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary data of this proof-of-concept study show how a combined deployment of AAE and S-ICD in selected patients at very high risk of infection is a safe and feasible technique and may offer a reliable treatment option in specific and selected clinical settings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article