Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Negotiating Use of a Blood-Based, Dual HIV and Syphilis Test with Potential Sexual Partners Among a Sample of Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men in New York City.
Lentz, Cody; Lopez-Rios, Javier; Dolezal, Curtis; Kutner, Bryan A; Rael, Christine Tagliaferri; Balán, Iván C.
Afiliação
  • Lentz C; HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lopez-Rios J; Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health at Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dolezal C; HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Kutner BA; HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Rael CT; HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Balán IC; College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus at Colorado University, Aurora, CO, USA.
Arch Sex Behav ; 51(4): 2015-2025, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35449365
Cisgender men who have sex with men (cMSM) and transgender women (TGW) are disproportionally burdened by HIV. Among these populations, HIV partner-testing is a highly acceptable harm reduction tool. Particularly, cMSM and TGW report a stronger preference for blood-based tests that include assays for multiple STIs. However, no existing research has explored how these populations negotiate blood-based testing with sexual partners. In the SMARTtest study, 48 sexually active cMSM and TGW took home dual, blood-based HIV/Syphilis kits for self- and partner-testing. After 3 months, they completed a follow-up assessment and in-depth interviews about their experiences initiating testing. Of the 42 responding participants, 27 (64%) reported that it had been "fairly" or "very easy" to raise the idea of testing with partners. Participants predominantly employed partner-conscious communication strategies, including framing the testing proposal as a mandatory, non-personal component of their participation in a research study, gradually incorporating testing mentions into discussions about sexual health, and using the kits to facilitate joint testing. Yet, 21 (44%) participants reported having sex with at least one partner they did not ask to test. Concern regarding partner reactions emerged as a significant barrier to discussing test use; similarly, many partners were averse to taking a blood-based test in the context of a casual sexual encounter. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that dual, blood-based HIV/STI rapid tests may represent acceptable harm reduction tools among similar populations of cMSM and TGW, particularly if future partner-testing research is broadened to consider key couples' dynamics that may impact test usage.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sífilis / Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis / Infecções por HIV / Pessoas Transgênero / Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sífilis / Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis / Infecções por HIV / Pessoas Transgênero / Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article