Assessing donor organ quality according to recipient characteristics in lung transplantation.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a shortage of donor lungs relative to need, but overall donor organ utilization remains low. The most common reason for refusal is organ quality, but the standards applied to selection vary. In this study we sought to characterize differences in lung utilization according to quality across several clinically distinct recipient pools. METHODS: Data on donor lungs recovered (April 2006 to September 2019) were extracted from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Organs were classified as ideal, standard, or extended quality according to their poorest metric among selected parameters. Subanalyses were performed on the basis of procedure type, age, lung allocation score, era, and alternative definitions of extended quality. Recipient traits and survival according to organ quality were assessed. RESULTS: Of 156,022 lungs analyzed during the study period, 25,777 (16.5%) were transplanted. There was no difference in quality distribution for single and bilateral transplants. Young candidates were more likely to receive ideal (14.7% vs 12.3%) or standard (9.5% vs 8.2%) lungs, but not extended lungs (75.9% vs 79.5%; all P < .01). Absolute differences in distribution according to lung allocation score quartile were small (<2%). Extended quality donor utilization increased over time. Survival according to donor category was similar at 1 and 3 years post transplant in unadjusted and Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Extended quality lungs comprise an increasing share of transplants in a national sample. Organ selection varies according to recipient age and lung allocation score. However, absolute differences in quality distribution are small, and adverse effects on outcomes are limited to organs with multiple extended qualifying characteristics.