Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bone-Mounted Robotic System in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery for Osteoporosis Patients: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.
Su, Yu-Feng; Tsai, Tai-Hsin; Lieu, Ann-Shung; Lin, Chih-Lung; Chang, Chih-Hui; Tsai, Cheng-Yu; Su, Hui-Yuan.
Afiliação
  • Su YF; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Tsai TH; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Lieu AS; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Lin CL; Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chang CH; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Tsai CY; Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Su HY; Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Clin Interv Aging ; 17: 589-599, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35497053
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Severe complications, including screw loosening events and low fusion rates, in spinal fusion surgery using the traditional open method are problematic. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the rate of screw loosening and the clinical outcomes of bone-mounted miniature robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in patients treated for degenerative spinal disease. Patients and

Methods:

Data were collected from the medical records of 118 patients (mean age, 69 years). Differences in clinical outcomes, including the Oswestry disability index, visual analog scale score, screw loosening rate, cage fusion rate, and complications, were evaluated among different bone mineral densities.

Results:

The screw loosening and cage fusion rates for all patients, normal bone mineral density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups were 12%, 8.6%, 13.1%, and 14%, respectively, and 85.3%, 93%, 82.5%, and 81.4%, respectively. There was a higher screw loosening rate and a lower cage fusion rate in the osteopenia and osteoporosis groups than in the normal bone density group. The accuracy of the screw placement was 97.3%. There were no statistically significant differences in the Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale scores, and no major complications for dural tear or vascular or visceral injury.

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrated an acceptable screw loosening rate in patients with osteoporosis compared to that in patients with normal bone mineral density. The robotic system resulted in accurate screw placement in patients with osteoporosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article