Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contact allergy to the Dexcom G6 glucose monitoring system-Role of 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate in the new adhesive.
Oppel, Eva; Högg, Christof; Oschmann, Anna; Summer, Burkhard; Kamann, Stefanie.
Afiliação
  • Oppel E; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
  • Högg C; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
  • Oschmann A; Faculty of Medicine, Walther Straub Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
  • Summer B; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
  • Kamann S; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(3): 258-264, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35503433
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Skin reactions to the glucose monitoring systems Dexcom G5 and G6 have been rare. In 2019, the components of the adhesive were exchanged for better skin fixation. Since then, more and more patients experienced severe skin reactions. A few months ago, 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate (MBPA) was identified as a new component in the adhesive of the G6 model. Furthermore, it was suspected that isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) was also a component of the exchanged adhesive.

OBJECTIVES:

Our objective was to investigate if MBPA plays a major role in the increasing skin problems of patients without a history of IBOA-sensitization. Furthermore, our aim was to examine whether IBOA is contained in the newer model adhesive and may also contribute to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Five patients with a newly occurred ACD caused by the glucose monitoring system Dexcom G6 were investigated. Patch testing including MBPA in three different concentrations, as well as IBOA, were performed. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of the newer system Dexcom G6 was carried out.

RESULTS:

All patients were shown to be sensitized to MBPA, while MBPA 0,5% showed the strongest reaction. On the other hand, IBOA was tested negative.

CONCLUSION:

In our study group, MBPA was observed to be the triggering allergen of the recently changed adhesive.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Alérgica de Contato Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Alérgica de Contato Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article