Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infrahyoid myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Di Maio, P; De Virgilio, A; Mincione, A; Zocchi, J; Boriani, F; Spriano, G; Deganello, A; Iocca, O.
Afiliação
  • Di Maio P; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Giuseppe Fornaroli Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Magenta, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: dimaio.p86@aliceposta.it.
  • De Virgilio A; Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
  • Mincione A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Giuseppe Fornaroli Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Magenta, Milan, Italy.
  • Zocchi J; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
  • Boriani F; Department of Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery, Teaching Hospital of Monserrato, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Spriano G; Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
  • Deganello A; Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Iocca O; Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, City of Health and Science of Turin Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 51(10): 1279-1288, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597668
ABSTRACT
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse the literature on the infrahyoid myocutaneous flap (IHMCF) and evaluate its clinical outcomes. The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched (inception to December 31, 2021). Meta-analyses were then conducted to estimate the overall rates of partial flap loss, total flap loss, salivary fistula, and surgical revision. The 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria included 768 patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with 773 IHMCF. The oral cavity (77.7%) and oropharynx (13.0%) were the most reconstructed sites. The meta-analyses estimated a pooled partial flap loss rate of 10.4% (99% confidence interval (CI) 5.4-16.7%), total loss rate of 1.8% (99% CI 0.8-3.2%), salivary fistula rate of 3.0% (99% CI 1.3-5.3%), and surgical revision rate of 1.9% (99% CI 0.7-3.7%). Fast flap harvesting and low donor site morbidity were other flap features. Previous thyroid surgery or neck dissection and advanced lymph nodal stage were considered contraindications to IHMCF reconstruction by most authors, while prior neck radiotherapy was reported as a relative contraindication. This pedicled cervical flap is a versatile and reliable reconstructive option for medium-sized head and neck defects. Careful preoperative assessment of the neck condition allows for its safe use.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Retalho Miocutâneo / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Retalho Miocutâneo / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article