Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of early neonatal case fatality rate among newborns with congenital hydrocephalus, a 2000-2014 multi-country registry-based study.
Gili, Juan Antonio; López-Camelo, Jorge Santiago; Nembhard, Wendy N; Bakker, Marian; de Walle, Hermien E K; Stallings, Erin B; Kancherla, Vijaya; Contiero, Paolo; Dastgiri, Saeed; Feldkamp, Marcia L; Nance, Amy; Gatt, Miriam; Martínez, Laura; Canessa, María Aurora; Groisman, Boris; Hurtado-Villa, Paula; Källén, Karin; Landau, Danielle; Lelong, Nathalie; Morgan, Margery; Arteaga-Vázquez, Jazmín; Pierini, Anna; Rissmann, Anke; Sipek, Antonin; Szabova, Elena; Wertelecki, Wladimir; Zarante, Ignacio; Canfield, Mark A; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo.
Afiliação
  • Gili JA; ECLAMC, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • López-Camelo JS; Instituto Académico Pedagógico de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional de Villa María, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Nembhard WN; ECLAMC, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bakker M; Department of Epidemiology, Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention and Arkansas Reproductive Health Monitoring System, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • de Walle HEK; Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, EUROCAT Northern Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Stallings EB; Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, EUROCAT Northern Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Kancherla V; Metro Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Contiero P; As listed in http://www.fundacion1000.es/Estructura-del-ECEMC for year 2021, Spain.
  • Dastgiri S; Lombardy Congenital Anomalies Registry, Cancer Registry Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Feldkamp ML; Health Services Management Research Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Nance A; Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Gatt M; Utah Birth Defect Network, Bureau of Children with Special Health Care Needs, Division of Family Health and Preparedness, Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Martínez L; Malta Congenital Anomalies Registry, Directorate for Health Information and Research, Tal-Pietà, Malta.
  • Canessa MA; Genetics Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González, Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico.
  • Groisman B; Regional Register Congenital Malformation Maule Health Service (RRMC-SSM), Maule, Chile.
  • Hurtado-Villa P; National Network of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina (RENAC), National Center of Medical Genetics, National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS), National Ministry of Health and Social Development, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Källén K; Department of Basic Sciences of Health, School of Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia.
  • Landau D; National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lelong N; Department of Neonatology, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Morgan M; Université de Paris, CRESS Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.
  • Arteaga-Vázquez J; CARIS, The Congenital Anomaly Register for Wales, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, Wales, UK.
  • Pierini A; Department of Genetics, RYVEMCE, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City, Mexico.
  • Rissmann A; Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council and Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Tuscany Registry of Congenital Defects, Pisa, Italy.
  • Sipek A; Medical Faculty, Malformation Monitoring Centre Saxony-Anhalt, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Szabova E; Department of Medical Genetics, Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Wertelecki W; Slovak Teratologic Information Centre (FPH), Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
  • Zarante I; Omni-Net for Children International Charitable Fund, Rivne, Ukraine.
  • Canfield MA; Human Genetics Institute, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Mastroiacovo P; Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA.
Birth Defects Res ; 114(12): 631-644, 2022 07 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633200
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Congenital hydrocephalus (CH) comprises a heterogeneous group of birth anomalies with a wide-ranging prevalence across geographic regions and registry type. The aim of the present study was to analyze the early neonatal case fatality rate (CFR) and total birth prevalence of newborns diagnosed with CH.

METHODS:

Data were provided by 25 registries from four continents participating in the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR) on births ascertained between 2000 and 2014. Two CH rates were calculated using a Poisson distribution early neonatal CFR (death within 7 days) per 100 liveborn CH cases (CFR) and total birth prevalence rate (BPR) per 10,000 births (including live births and stillbirths) (BPR). Heterogeneity between registries was calculated using a meta-analysis approach with random effects. Temporal trends in CFR and BPR within registries were evaluated through Poisson regression modeling.

RESULTS:

A total of 13,112 CH cases among 19,293,280 total births were analyzed. The early neonatal CFR was 5.9 per 100 liveborn cases, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.4-6.8. The CFR among syndromic cases was 2.7 times (95% CI 2.2-3.3) higher than among non-syndromic cases (10.4% [95% CI 9.3-11.7] and 4.4% [95% CI 3.7-5.2], respectively). The total BPR was 6.8 per 10,000 births (95% CI 6.7-6.9). Stratified by elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies (ETOPFA), region and system, higher CFR were observed alongside higher BPR rates. The early neonatal CFR and total BPR did not show temporal variation, with the exception of a CFR decrease in one registry.

CONCLUSIONS:

Findings of early neonatal CFR and total BPR were highly heterogeneous among registries participating in ICBDSR. Most registries with higher CFR also had higher BPR. Differences were attributable to type of registry (hospital-based vs. population-based), ETOPFA (allowed yes or no) and geographical regions. These findings contribute to the understanding of regional differences of CH occurrence and early neonatal deaths.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Natimorto / Hidrocefalia Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Natimorto / Hidrocefalia Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article