Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for the detection of periprosthetic joint infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: a prospective feasibility study.
Henkelmann, Jeanette; Henkelmann, Ralf; Denecke, Timm; Zajonz, Dirk; Roth, Andreas; Sabri, Osama; Purz, Sandra.
Afiliação
  • Henkelmann J; Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. jeanette.henkelmann@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Henkelmann R; Department for Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Denecke T; Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Zajonz D; Department for Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Roth A; Clinic for Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Zeißigwald Hospital Bethanien Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
  • Sabri O; Department for Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Purz S; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Int Orthop ; 46(9): 1921-1928, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35635553
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee.

METHODS:

Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were prospectively examined using PET/MRI. Image datasets were evaluated in consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear physician for the overall diagnosis of 'PJI' (yes/no) and its anatomical involvement, such as the periprosthetic bone margin, bone marrow, and soft tissue. The imaging results were compared with the reference standard obtained from surgical or biopsy specimens and subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS:

Using the reference standard, ten out of the 13 prostheses (ten hips, threes knees) were diagnosed with PJI. Using PET/MRI, every patient with PJI was correctly diagnosed (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Considering the anatomical regions, the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 50% in the periprosthetic bone margin, 75% and 33% in the bone marrow, and 100% and 100% in the soft tissue.

CONCLUSION:

PET/MRI can be reliably used for the diagnosis of PJI. However, assessment of the periprosthetic bone remains difficult due to the presence of artefacts. Thus, currently, this modality is unlikely to be recommended in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Infecciosa / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Infecciosa / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article