Characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: A comparison between an Australian emergency department and the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a rare, life-threatening condition for which the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) remains the most detailed clinical resource. The present study compared the characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of patients presenting to Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia (LPOOL) with AAD to those in IRAD. Secondary aims were to identify LPOOL patient variables associated with 30-day mortality and to assess the impact of transfer times in the ED on 30-day mortality. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients presenting to LPOOL with AAD between 2011 and 2019. Clinical records were examined and compared with IRAD data. Variables in LPOOL associated (P < 0.10) with 30-day mortality by univariable analysis were subsequently entered in a multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Mediation analysis was performed to assess the impact of ED transfer times on 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of 156 LPOOL patients were overall similar to those in IRAD. Syncope, weakness or paralysis, raised lactate and chest X-ray abnormalities were identified as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Time from ED to ICU explained 28% of the variance in survival at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics, clinical features and outcomes of patients with AAD presenting to LPOOL appeared similar to those reported by IRAD. The identification of independent mortality predictors serves to improve the understanding of local AAD presentations. Reducing ED to ICU transfer times may increase 30-day survival and further interdisciplinary research should be considered.