Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Fang, Chaohua; Cheng, Rongshan; Jiang, Jian; Dimitriou, Dimitris; Wang, Huizhi; Jiang, Ziang; Tsai, Tsung-Yuan; Cheng, Cheng-Kung.
Afiliação
  • Fang C; Department of Sports Medicine, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
  • Cheng R; School of Biomedical Engineering and Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Jiang J; Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
  • Dimitriou D; School of Biomedical Engineering and Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang H; Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
  • Jiang Z; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants and Clinical Translation R&D Center of 3D Printing Technology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Tsai TY; Department of Operating Room, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
  • Cheng CK; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Front Surg ; 9: 863823, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35647013
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present study is to compare the graft preparation time and the biomechanical performance between an efficient needleless technique and the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods:

The time required to perform a complete suture on 20 hamstring tendons during ACLRs was measured. The grafts from one side were prepared using the needle stitching technique. The grafts from the other side used the needleless grasping suture technique. For the second part of the study, 12 fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons were divided into two groups using two techniques and were mounted in an electric tensile test system. Each group was pretensioned to 100 N to simulate the maximum initial graft tension. The suturing state of sutures and graft (intact and damaged) and the load-elongation curve were recorded for each group. A Student's t-test was used to compare the means of the two groups.

Results:

In operation, the needleless grasping suture technique group (19.8 ± 4.8, range 13.5-32.9 s) was significantly faster (p < 0.05) than the needle stitching technique group (52.7 ± 12.7, range 36.0-87.5 s). The state of sutures in each group was intact. The mean elongation was 11.75 ± 1.38 (range 9.47-12.99) mm and 10.59 ± 1.02 (range 9.12-11.76) mm in the needleless stitching technique group and the needle grasping suture technique group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the elongation between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

The needleless grasping suture technique was a convenient and efficient method for graft preparation in ACLR.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article