Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resource utilization in mental illness - evaluation of an instrument for measuring direct costs of treatment for patients with severe mental illness (SMI).
Stenmark, Richard; Eberhard, Jonas; Edman, Gunnar; Gaughran, Fiona; Jedenius, Erik.
Afiliação
  • Stenmark R; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Severe Mental Illness Research Unit, Lund University, Psychiatry Research Center, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
  • Eberhard J; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Severe Mental Illness Research Unit, Lund University, Psychiatry Research Center, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
  • Edman G; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Gaughran F; Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Jedenius E; Research and Development, Norrtälje Hospital, Tiohundra AB, Norrtälje, Sweden.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 77(2): 172-178, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35649422
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Serious mental illnesses (SMIs) exert a considerable financial burden on health-care systems. In this study, the resource utilization in mental illness (RUMI) tool was developed and employed to evaluate resource utilization in patients with SMI. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Data from 107 patients with SMI treated in four psychiatric outpatient clinics in Sweden were collected. The relationships between costs for physical and psychiatric care, social services, and the justice system, to self-reported health and quality of life, educational level, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), the Clinical Global Impressions scale score (CGI), and body mass index (BMI) were studied.

RESULTS:

Sixteen out of 107 patients accounted for 74% of the total costs. The mean and median cost for 6 months included in the survey for social services, family and social welfare and healthcare, psychiatric and physical treatment interventions, mean 8349 EUR, median 2599 EUR per patient (currency value for 2021). Education and psychosocial function (GAF) were both negatively correlated with costs for the social services (education, r=-0.207, p < 0.014; GAF, r=-0.258, p < 0.001). CGI was correlated with costs for physical and psychiatric healthcare (r = 0.161, p < 0.027), social services support (r = 0.245, p = 0.002) and total cost (r = 0.198, p = 0.007). BMI correlated with costs for psychiatric and physical health settings interventions (r = 0.155, p < 0.019) and for somatic and psychiatric medicines (r = 0.154, p < 0.019).

CONCLUSION:

The RUMI scale was acceptable and enabled estimation of resource utilization in a comparable manner across different care settings. Such comparable data have potential to provide a basis for budgeting and resource allocation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article