Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frailty, gaps in care coordination, and preventable adverse events.
Akinyelure, Oluwasegun P; Colvin, Calvin L; Sterling, Madeline R; Safford, Monika M; Muntner, Paul; Colantonio, Lisandro D; Kern, Lisa M.
Afiliação
  • Akinyelure OP; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Colvin CL; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Sterling MR; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70th Street, Box 331, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Safford MM; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70th Street, Box 331, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Muntner P; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Colantonio LD; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Kern LM; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70th Street, Box 331, New York, NY, 10021, USA. lmk2003@med.cornell.edu.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 476, 2022 06 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35655193
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Older US adults often receive care from multiple ambulatory providers. Seeing multiple providers may be clinically appropriate but creates challenges for communication. Whether frailty is a risk factor for gaps in communication among older adults and subsequent preventable adverse events is unknown.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of community-dwelling US adults ≥ 65 years of age in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who attended an in-home study examination in 2013-2016 and completed a survey on experiences with healthcare in 2017-2018 (n = 5,024). Using 5 frailty indicators (low body mass index, exhaustion, slow walk, weakness, and history of falls), we characterized participants into 3 mutually exclusive groups not frail (0 indicators), intermediate-frail (1-2 indicators), and frail (3-5 indicators). We used survey data on self-reported gaps in care coordination and self-reported adverse events that participants attributed to poor communication among providers (a drug-drug interaction, repeat testing, an emergency department visit, or a hospital admission).

RESULTS:

Overall, 2,398 (47.7%) participants were not frail, 2,436 (48.5%) were intermediate-frail, and 190 (3.8%) were frail. The prevalence of any gap in care coordination was 37.0%, 40.8%, and 51.1% among participants who were not frail, intermediate-frail and frail, respectively. The adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) for any gap in care coordination among intermediate-frail and frail versus not frail participants was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.02-1.18) and 1.34 (95%CI 1.15-1.56), respectively. The prevalence of any preventable adverse event was 7.0%, 11.3% and 20.0% among participants who were not frail, intermediate-frail and frail, respectively. The adjusted PR for any preventable adverse event among those who were intermediate-frail and frail versus not frail was 1.47 (95%CI 1.22-1.77) and 2.24 (95%CI 1.60-3.14), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Among older adults, frailty is associated with an increased prevalence for self-reported gaps in care coordination and preventable adverse events. Targeted interventions to address patient-reported concerns regarding care coordination among intermediate-frail and frail older adults may be warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article