Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: A systematic review.
Freeman, Lucinda; Righetti, Sarah; Delatycki, Martin B; Scully, Jackie Leach; Kirk, Edwin P.
Afiliação
  • Freeman L; School of Women's and Children's Health, Medicine, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Righetti S; School of Women's and Children's Health, Medicine, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Delatycki MB; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Scully JL; Disability Innovation Institute, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kirk EP; School of Women's and Children's Health, Medicine, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: edwin.kirk@health.nsw.gov.au.
Genet Med ; 24(9): 1803-1813, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35659827
PURPOSE: Genes associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss are commonly included in reproductive carrier screening panels, which are now routinely offered in preconception and prenatal care in many countries. However, there is debate whether hearing loss should be considered a medical condition appropriate for screening. This systematic review assessed research on opinions of those with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting. METHODS: Search of 5 online databases yielded 423 articles, 20 of which met inclusion criteria. We assessed the quality of each study, extracted data, and performed thematic analysis on qualitative studies. RESULTS: Most studies indicated interest in the use of prenatal diagnosis for deafness. However, there were mixed views, and sometimes strongly held views, expressed regarding the reproductive options that should be available to those with an increased chance of having a child with deafness. Studies were small, from a limited number of countries, and most were too old to include views regarding preimplantation genetic testing. CONCLUSION: There is a broad range of views regarding the use of reproductive options for deafness. Further research is essential to explore the benefits and harms of including nonsyndromic hearing loss genes in carrier screening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Surdez Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Surdez Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article