Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Different Measures and Ways to Categorize Pediatrician Burnout and the Association with Satisfaction.
Byrne, Bobbi J; Frintner, Mary Pat; Starmer, Amy J; Gottschlich, Elizabeth A; Freed, Gary L.
Afiliação
  • Byrne BJ; Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Frintner MP; American Academy of Pediatrics, Research, Itasca, IL.
  • Starmer AJ; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Gottschlich EA; American Academy of Pediatrics, Research, Itasca, IL.
  • Freed GL; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
J Pediatr ; 249: 84-91, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35660489
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Compare pediatrician burnout when measured and categorized in different ways to better understand burnout and the association with satisfaction. STUDY

DESIGN:

We analyzed national survey data from a cohort study of early to midcareer pediatricians. In 2017, participants randomly received 1 of 3 question sets measuring burnout components (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) group A received the Maslach Burnout Inventory, group B received a previously used measure, and group C received a new severe measure. Repeated measures ANOVA tested differences across burnout categorizations high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization and low personal accomplishment; high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization; and high emotional exhaustion or high depersonalization. Logistic regression tested relationships between burnout profiles (engaged, intermediate, and burnout) and satisfaction. Seventy-one percent of participants completed the survey (1279/1800).

RESULTS:

Burnout varied depending on measurement (groups A, B, and C) and categorization. For example, for group A, when categorized as high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment, burnout was lower (4.8%) than categorized as high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization (15.2%) (P < .001) or categorized as high emotional exhaustion or depersonalization (44.6%) (P < .001). Most participants were satisfied with their career (83.6%). Using burnout profiles, 38.4%-85.1% fell in the engaged profile. For each group, burnout profiles were associated with satisfaction. For example, group A participants in the burnout or intermediate profile were less likely than those engaged to be satisfied with their careers (aOR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.03-0.24]; and aOR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10-0.56], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

The way burnout is measured and categorized affects burnout prevalence and its association with satisfaction. Transparency in methodology used is critical to interpreting results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esgotamento Profissional / Satisfação no Emprego Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esgotamento Profissional / Satisfação no Emprego Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article