Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biometric and Structural Ocular Manifestations of Anterior Megalophthalmos.
Chen, Tian-Hui; Chen, Ze-Xu; Zhang, Min; Chen, Jia-Hui; Lan, Li-Na; Jiang, Yongxiang.
Afiliação
  • Chen TH; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen ZX; Key Laboratory of Myopia of State Health Ministry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhang M; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen JH; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Lan LN; Key Laboratory of Myopia of State Health Ministry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China.
  • Jiang Y; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 732452, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35665341
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The aim of this study was to examine the biometric ocular manifestations and structural ocular features of anterior megalophthalmos (AM).

Methods:

Fifteen patients with AM (30 eyes) from the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University were included. The age-matched control group consisted of 30 participants (30 eyes) who underwent Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700 measurements for one normal eye. Data on demographics, biometric manifestations, and genotypes were carefully compared.

Results:

A total of 15 patients with AM and 30 control patients were enrolled. There were no differences in age (37.27 ± 19.1 vs. 31.43 ± 19.69 years, P = 0.249) between these two groups. AM eyes were characterized by premature cataracts (11/30, 36.67%) and zonular weakness with lens subluxation (22/30, 73.33%) compared with the control group. Notably, 20 of the 30 AM eyes (66.67%) had significant posterior iris bowing, and 16 of the 30 AM eyes (53.33%) showed an enlarged ciliary ring on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Mean corneal curvature was lower in the AM eyes (42.01 ± 2.06 D vs. 43.14 ± 1.38 D, P = 0.023). There was no significant difference in corneal pachymetry and central endothelial cell count between the AM and control groups. Significant differences were found in terms of the anterior chamber and white-to-white (WTW) among the Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700 in patients with AM (P < 0.05). The difference was 0.53 ± 0.48 mm and 0.36 ± 0.14 mm, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

The results of this cohort study conclude the biometric and structural ocular manifestations in Chinese cohorts. Posterior iris bowing (66.67%) and lens subluxation (73.33%) are the most characteristic findings in patients with AM with anatomical abnormalities of megalocornea and a deep anterior chamber, although corneal biometric manifestations of AM included flatter cornea and lower total corneal astigmatism. The knowledge of ocular manifestations of AM is important for diagnosis and preparation for the operation in advance to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications. Significant differences were found in the anterior chamber and WTW values between the Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700. Thus, we suggest that various examinations should be carefully considered before determining an AM diagnosis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article