Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the Treatment of Patients With Erythrodermic (Stage T4, M0) Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the Australian Setting.
Peacock, Adrian; Dehle, Francis; Mesa Zapata, Oscar Alejandro; Prince, H Miles; Gennari, Francesca; Taylor, Colman.
Afiliação
  • Peacock A; Health Technology Analysts, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Dehle F; Health Technology Analysts, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Mesa Zapata OA; MNK Pharmaceuticals, Staines-upon-Thames, England, UK.
  • Prince HM; Department of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gennari F; MNK Pharmaceuticals, Staines-upon-Thames, England, UK.
  • Taylor C; Health Technology Analysts, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: colman.taylor@htanalysts.com.au.
Value Health ; 25(6): 965-974, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667784
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare and incurable disease, and patients currently experience a lack of treatment options in Australia. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) compared with standard of care therapy for the treatment of patients with erythrodermic (stage T4, M0) CTCL, who are refractory to previous systemic treatment.

METHODS:

A Markov model was developed from the perspective of the Australian government. Health states were treatment specific and transition probabilities were modeled from time-to-next-treatment data from a published Australian observational study of ECP and comparator treatments. Quality of life utility values were based on psoriasis as a proxy for CTCL, which was validated by consultation with local clinicians. The time horizon for the model was 5 years. The ECP treatment regimen was compared with a weighted treatment comparator based on results of a treatment survey and Australian prescribing data.

RESULTS:

ECP as a second-line treatment option for CTCL was less costly and more effective than other treatment strategies. ECP had an average cost saving of $37 592 and incremental quality-adjusted life-year gained of 0.20 to 0.21, attributed to patients being able to better tolerate ECP thus avoiding subsequent treatment with high-cost alternatives.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first published cost-utility analysis of ECP for CTCL. This analysis demonstrates that ECP is a cost-effective option for the treatment of patients with erythrodermic CTCL in Australia.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T / Fotoferese Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T / Fotoferese Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article