Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global trends in oncology research: A mixed-methods study of publications and clinical trials from 2010 to 2019.
Akiki, Vincent; Troussard, Xavier; Metges, Jean-Philippe; Devos, Patrick.
Afiliação
  • Akiki V; Comité National de Coordination de la Recherche, Paris, France.
  • Troussard X; Department of Haematology, CHU Caen Normandie, Caen, France.
  • Metges JP; CHU de Brest, Inserm, University Brest, EFS, Brest, France.
  • Devos P; Comité National de Coordination de la Recherche, Paris, France.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 6(1): e1650, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35689556
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the cancer research effort of some major countries over two 5-year periods (2010-2014 and 2015-2019) on the basis of scientific publications and interventional clinical trial metrics and to analyze the relationship between research effort and cancer burden (incidence and mortality). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Clinical trials were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov using a specific query. Publications were identified in Web of Science (WoS) using a query based on keywords and were then analyzed using InCites, a bibliometric tool. Bibliometric indicators were computed per country and per period.

RESULTS:

During 2010-2019, 1 120 821 cancer-related publications were identified in WoS, with 447 900 and 672 921 (+50%) articles respectively published in 2010-2014 and 2015-2019. Meanwhile, 38% and 7% of the articles were published in oncology and cell biology journals, respectively. Exactly 30% of the published articles were contributed by the USA. In the study period, China strongly increased its production and overspecialization. Apart from China, which had a low normalized citation impact (NCI), almost all countries increased their NCIs; in particular, France's NCI increased from 1.69 to 2.44. As for clinical trials, over 36 856 were opened worldwide during that period. Over 17 000 (46.5%) opened in the USA, which remained the leader during the study period. China ranked second worldwide in terms of the number of open trials in 2015-2019. Results revealed that the 17 cancer localizations versus cancer burden and research effort showed no evident relationship.

CONCLUSION:

The results may provide a scientific basis for decision making for continued research. Based on bibliometric data, this type of study will aid public health policymaking and lead to a more transparent public fund allocation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bibliometria / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bibliometria / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article