Effect of custom abutment data superimposition on the accuracy of implant abutment level scanning: An in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: When scanning implant abutments, an incomplete scan is often obtained because of a subgingival location or restricted accessibility. Whether these problems can be overcome with a novel scanning technique with digital superimposition of the custom abutment is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the process of superimposing the custom abutment library data onto the scanned abutment data on the accuracy of the digital scan with an intraoral scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model with a single implant was prepared. The custom abutment of the corresponding implant was produced and was scanned with a laboratory scanner to produce the custom abutment library data. The custom abutment was connected to the implant, and the model was scanned with a laboratory scanner for the reference data. The custom abutment and adjacent teeth were scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner. Thus, 10 files were saved as the first test group (IOS). After transferring 10 files of the group IOS to a computer-aided design (CAD) software program (exocad DentalCAD), the custom abutment library data were superimposed on the corresponding abutments, and the results were saved as the second test group (S-Exo). For the third test group (S-Den), the same superimposing process was performed as for the group S-Exo but by using another CAD software program (Dental System). The accuracy of the files of the 3 test groups was evaluated by comparing them with the reference file by using a 3D inspection software program. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS: The RMS of the IOS group decreased significantly from 42.1 ±1.1 µm to 36.37 ±0.74 µm for the S-Exo group and 36.89 ±0.69 µm for the S-Den group after superimposition (P<.05). InTOL increased significantly from 88.17 ±0.75% to 91.57 ±0.56% in the S-Exo group and 91.31 ±0.56% in the S-Den group (P<.05). For the mean 3D discrepancy of all 66 points along the margin and 16 points of interest, the IOS group showed significantly higher discrepancy than the superimposed groups (P<.05), implying that the accuracy of scanned data with the intraoral scanner increased after superimposition with the abutment library data. No significant difference was found according to the type of software program (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The process of superimposing the titanium custom abutment with the prescanned custom abutment library data improved the accuracy of a digital scan made with an intraoral scanner.