Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary impact of simultaneous use of double devices through one-working channel when performing flexible ureteroscope with ureteral access sheath for single ureteral stone: In bench and retrospective clinical study.
Inoue, Takaaki; Hamamoto, Shuzo; Okada, Shinsuke; Yamamichi, Fukashi; Fujita, Masaichiro; Tominaga, Koki; Fujisawa, Masato.
Afiliação
  • Inoue T; Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Hamamoto S; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Okada S; Department of Urology, Medical School, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
  • Yamamichi F; Department of Urology, Gyotoku General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan.
  • Fujita M; Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Tominaga K; Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Fujisawa M; Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
Int J Urol ; 29(10): 1163-1169, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710688
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to compare the simultaneous use of two devices versus a single device through a single working channel in flexible ureteroscopy using a ureteral access sheath for single ureteral stones.

METHODS:

In a bench study, the time to (i) set laser fiber, (ii) exchange laser fiber and nitinol basket through working channel, and (iii) pull out the device from working channel were measured 10 times in each step. In a clinical study, 156 patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy with a ureteral access sheath for a ureteral stone in middle and upper ureter between April 2019 and November 2021 were assessed. One device was used at a time for 79 patients (S-Group) and two were simultaneously used for 77 (D-Group). Surgical outcomes and complications were compared.

RESULTS:

In the bench study, the mean time to change from laser fiber to basket and from basket to laser fiber through the working channel were 26.1 ± 3.7 s and 23.6 ± 2.0 s (p = 0.084), respectively, which were significantly longer than the laser setup time (p < 0.001). In the clinical study, although the stone-free rate was not significantly different between the groups (S-Group 89.8%, D-Group 93.5%; p = 0.412), the median operation time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and the rate of postoperative stenting was significantly lower (p = 0.002) in the D-Group. There were no significant between-group differences in intra- and post-operative complications.

CONCLUSION:

The simultaneous use of two devices through a single working channel is safe and could help save the time needed to exchange the laser fiber and nitinol basket.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureter / Cálculos Ureterais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureter / Cálculos Ureterais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article