[Pilot survey on continuing education for pharmacists in Germany]. / Piloterhebung zur Fortbildungssituation der Apotheker*innen in Deutschland.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Continuing education (CE) for pharmacists is mandatory in Germany. However, the findings on CE activities of pharmacists are limited. The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot survey on the CE situation of pharmacists in Germany, including licensed and future pharmacists, to determine the commitment to CE, the attitude towards CE and an obligation to provide evidence, the extent of CE considered necessary and the application of CE content in professional practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the form of an online survey using SoSci survey, which was addressed to licensed pharmacists, pre-registration pharmacists, and pharmacy students. The online survey was promoted by pharmaceutical professional societies, trade media and interest groups. RESULTS: In total, 880 participants were included in the study 695 pharmacists, 136 pharmacy students and 49 pre-registration pharmacists. Only 50.0% of the participants were aware of their CE obligations. Among the pharmacists, 44.9% reported that they held the voluntary advanced training certificate issued by the Chambers of Pharmacists. 551 participants reported the CE points of the past twelve month. On average, 56.2 ±â€¯50.2 CE points were collected (x̅ = 210.8 CE minutes per month). Pharmacists not holding the voluntary advanced training certificate of the Chamber of Pharmacists collected significantly fewer (p < 0.001) CE points (39.5 ±â€¯32.0 points; x̅ = 148.1 CE minutes per month). On average, the study population considered a minimum number of 33.9 ±â€¯20.9 CE points per year (x̅ = 127.1 CE minutes per month) to be adequate to meet the CE requirements. DISCUSSION: Although the majority participated in CE, the introduction of nationwide CE commitment monitoring was rejected. On the one hand, this may be linked to a lack of willingness to engage in lifelong learning. On the other hand, it should be borne in mind that, despite the same common nationwide legal basis, the different Chambers of Pharmacists districts have set up different rules concerning the minimum yearly CE commitment, the proof of compliance with CE requirements and fines for non-compliance. Therefore, the introduction of nationwide standard regulations may result in a greater acceptance of CE commitment checks. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' willingness to CE participation has so far been dependent on intrinsic motivation. Although many licensed pharmacists were in possession of the advanced training certificate issued by the Chambers of Pharmacists, the majority of participants did not support the introduction of a nationwide CE commitment monitoring. 127.1 CE minutes per month were considered appropriate to fulfill the CE obligations, which is significantly less than the 187.5 CE minutes per month which are required to obtain the advanced training certificate of the Chambers of Pharmacists.