Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addition of probenecid to oral ß-lactam antibiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wilson, Richard C; Arkell, Paul; Riezk, Alaa; Gilchrist, Mark; Wheeler, Graham; Hope, William; Holmes, Alison H; Rawson, Timothy M.
Afiliação
  • Wilson RC; National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
  • Arkell P; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, Acton, London W12 0NN, UK.
  • Riezk A; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
  • Gilchrist M; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, Acton, London W12 0NN, UK.
  • Wheeler G; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
  • Hope W; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, Acton, London W12 0NN, UK.
  • Holmes AH; National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
  • Rawson TM; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, Acton, London W12 0NN, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(9): 2364-2372, 2022 08 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726853
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To explore the literature comparing the pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes from adding probenecid to oral ß-lactams.

METHODS:

Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 2021 for all English language studies comparing the addition of probenecid (intervention) with an oral ß-lactam [flucloxacillin, penicillin V, amoxicillin (±â€Šclavulanate), cefalexin, cefuroxime axetil] alone (comparator). ROBINS-I and ROB-2 tools were used. Data on antibiotic therapy, infection diagnosis, primary and secondary outcomes relating to pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes, plus adverse events were extracted and reported descriptively. For a subset of studies comparing treatment failure between probenecid and control groups, meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Overall, 18/295 (6%) screened abstracts were included. Populations, methodology and outcome data were heterogeneous. Common populations included healthy volunteers (9/18; 50%) and those with gonococcal infection (6/18; 33%). Most studies were crossover trials (11/18; 61%) or parallel-arm randomized trials (4/18; 22%). Where pharmacokinetic analyses were performed, addition of probenecid to oral ß-lactams increased total AUC (7/7; 100%), Cmax (5/8; 63%) and serum t½ (6/8; 75%). Probenecid improved PTA (2/2; 100%). Meta-analysis of 3105 (2258 intervention, 847 control) patients treated for gonococcal disease demonstrated a relative risk of treatment failure in the random-effects model of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20-0.55; I2 = 7%), favouring probenecid.

CONCLUSIONS:

Probenecid-boosted ß-lactam therapy is associated with improved outcomes in gonococcal disease. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that probenecid-boosted oral ß-lactam therapy may have a broader application, but appropriately powered mechanistic and efficacy studies are required.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gonorreia / Probenecid Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gonorreia / Probenecid Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article