Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disparities in Tobacco Use by Disability and Type: Findings From the 2019 National Health Interview Survey.
Schulz, Jonathan A; West, Julia C; Hall, Jean P; Villanti, Andrea C.
Afiliação
  • Schulz JA; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. Electronic address: jonathan.schulz@uvm.edu.
  • West JC; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; Department of Psychological Science, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
  • Hall JP; Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
  • Villanti AC; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; Department of Psychological Science, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Am J Prev Med ; 63(4): 552-563, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35753866
INTRODUCTION: People with disabilities report a higher prevalence of cigarette use than people without disabilities. However, evidence is limited on the relationships between disability type, degree of functional difficulty, and other tobacco product use. METHODS: Data from the 2019 U.S. National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the prevalence and odds of tobacco product use for 6 disability types and degree of functional difficulty. Bivariate and multivariable analyses conducted in 2021 examined the associations between tobacco product use and disability type. RESULTS: Compared to adults who reported no difficulty, current cigarette use prevalence was higher for adults who reported a lot of difficulty/cannot do at all to vision (21.5% vs 13.1%), hearing (19.6% vs 13.6%), mobility (20.0% vs 12.9%), and cognitive (25.4% vs 12.9%) disability questions. The odds of current cigarette (AOR=1.32), pipe (AOR=1.85), and smokeless tobacco (AOR=1.57) use were significantly higher for adults who reported a lot of difficulty/cannot do at all to any disability question and significantly higher for current cigarette (AOR=1.24), e-cigarette (AOR=1.33), pipe (AOR=1.45), and smokeless tobacco (AOR=1.29) use for adults who reported some difficulty to any disability question than those who reported no difficulty. Pipe use was correlated with mobility difficulty (AOR=1.68), and smokeless tobacco use was correlated with hearing difficulty (AOR=1.95). CONCLUSIONS: People who reported difficulty with vision, hearing, mobility, or cognition had a higher cigarette use prevalence than people without disabilities. Other tobacco use differed by disability type. Future research should tailor tobacco interventions to reduce these disparities.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tabagismo / Tabaco sem Fumaça / Pessoas com Deficiência / Produtos do Tabaco / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tabagismo / Tabaco sem Fumaça / Pessoas com Deficiência / Produtos do Tabaco / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article