Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale in patients with advanced hepatopancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Shah, Dinakshi; Kapacee, Zainul Abedin; Lamarca, Angela; Hubner, Richard A; Valle, Juan W; McNamara, Mairéad G.
Afiliação
  • Shah D; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Kapacee ZA; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Lamarca A; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Hubner RA; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Valle JW; Division of Cancer Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • McNamara MG; Division of Cancer Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 22(9): 1009-1015, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768183
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Co-existing frailty in older patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) malignancies is common. This study assessed the relationship between the Rockwood Clinical Frailty scale (CFS) and systemic anti-cancer therapy dose intensity (SACT-DI) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced HPB malignancies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

CFS was assessed prospectively for consecutive patients with newly diagnosed advanced HPB malignancy (The Christie; Sep-2019 to June-2020). Mann-Whitney U test assessed association between CFS, ECOG Performance Status (ECOG PS), and SACT-DI and Spearman's rank assessed the association between ECOG PS, age, and frailty. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.

RESULTS:

Two hundred patients met inclusion criteria. SACT-DI was higher in Group-1 (not frail) (CFS 1-3)(median = 61%) than Group-2 (vulnerable/mildly frail) (CFS 4-5)(median = 25.1%), p < 0.001.       Median OS was shorter in frail and pre-frail patients (HR 2.3(95%CI 1.8-2.9),p < 0.001. On multivariable analysis, both CFS (HR 1.5-(95%CI 1.2-1.9), p = 0.002) and ECOG PS (HR 1.9 (95%CI 1.6-2.3), p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION:

Frailty assessments, in addition to ECOG PS, may identify patients that will benefit from systemic therapy and are both independent prognostic factors for OS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article