Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Results From a Heart Failure Society of America Survey.
Chuzi, Sarah; Pensa, Anthony V; Allen, Larry A; Cross, Sarah H; Feder, Shelli L; Warraich, Haider J.
Afiliação
  • Chuzi S; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Pensa AV; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Allen LA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Cross SH; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Feder SL; Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, Connecticut; Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-Morbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT.
  • Warraich HJ; Division of Cardiovaular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Cardiology Section, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: hwarraich@partners.org.
J Card Fail ; 29(1): 112-115, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842103
BACKGROUND: Multiple guidelines recommend specialty palliative care (PC) for patients with heart failure (HF), including patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the degree of integration and clinicians' perceptions of PC in HF care remain incompletely characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 36-item survey was sent to 2109 members of the Heart Failure Society of America. Eighty respondents (53% physicians), including 51 respondents from at least 42 medical centers, completed the survey, with the majority practicing in urban (76%) academic medical centers (62%) that implanted LVADs (81%). Among the 42 unique medical centers identified, respondents reported both independent (40%) and integrated (40%) outpatient PC clinic models, whereas 12% reported not having outpatient PC at their institutions. A minority (12%) reported that their institution used triggered PC referrals based on objective clinical data. Of respondents from LVAD sites, the majority reported that a clinician from the PC team was required to see all patients prior to implantation, but there was variability in practices. Among all respondents, the most common reasons for PC referral in HF were poor prognosis, consideration of advanced cardiac therapies or other high-risk procedures and advance-care planning or goals-of-care discussions. The most frequent perceived barriers to PC consultation included lack of PC clinicians, unpredictable HF clinical trajectories and limited understanding of how PC can complement traditional HF care. CONCLUSION: PC integration and clinician perceptions of services vary in HF care. More research and guidance regarding evidence-based models of PC delivery in HF are needed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article